OnScript reads what members of Congress publish and counts the phrases they say together. Every claim below links to the press releases it came from.
Publication delayed: 2026-10-11
Observed congressional language on 2026-10-11, rendered as two cited automated composites.
Measurement: 3 publications were observed for the Democratic party on 2026-10-11.
withheld_no_eligible_claimWe released 3 statements today.
A composite voice, machine-composed from the day’s measured phrases. No member spoke these exact sentences; the quoted spans are verbatim (see receipts).
No talking point cleared the 3-member threshold today — nothing to cite.
Measurement: 2 publications were observed for the Republican party on 2026-10-11.
withheld_no_eligible_claimWe released 2 statements today.
A composite voice, machine-composed from the day’s measured phrases. No member spoke these exact sentences; the quoted spans are verbatim (see receipts).
No talking point cleared the 3-member threshold today — nothing to cite.
Where language spread this window
D Democrats
Peak 28 offices on 2026-09-11.
Democrats (solid line) Republicans (dashed line)
R Republicans
Peak 33 offices on 2026-07-22.
Democrats (solid line) Republicans (dashed line)
How these two were chosen: for each party independently, code takes that party's phrase with the highest single-day office count in the trailing 90 days, counting only phrases that reached at least 15 offices on some day in that window. Ties go to the earlier first appearance, then to the alphabetically first identifier. No model chooses, and neither party's pick constrains the other's.
How this is counted
Participation in eligible message claims
Each measure keeps one count unit from numerator through denominator.
D
- Office participation: 0 offices of 3 offices. Window: party-day 2026-10-11. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Publication participation: 0 publications of 3 publications. Window: party-day 2026-10-11. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Document-family participation: 0 document families of 3 document families. Window: party-day 2026-10-11. Method: participation-measures-v1.
R
- Office participation: 0 offices of 2 offices. Window: party-day 2026-10-11. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Publication participation: 0 publications of 2 publications. Window: party-day 2026-10-11. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Document-family participation: 0 document families of 2 document families. Window: party-day 2026-10-11. Method: participation-measures-v1.
These two bases differ. Office counts come from the day's eligible caucus offices in the nightly symmetry audit; publication counts come from the day's source publications. A joint release is one publication and can carry several offices, so the two never have to agree.
How phrases are sorted
Classification lanes
The deterministic classifier separates messages, shared names, procedure, and retained raw observations.
Messages
- No observations in this lane.
Shared names
- No observations in this lane.
Procedure
- No observations in this lane.
Raw observations
- No observations in this lane.
Raw observations remain available in the experimental exports.
Nightly symmetry audit: nightly symmetry audit. Every distilled claim above is citation-backed.
Repeated phrase observations
This table lists repeated phrase observations, ranked by how many members used the same exact phrase. It is not filtered to coordinated messages, so it can include official names, procedural formulas, and biographical phrasing, not only messages. The sparkline is the phrase's 14-day trajectory.
Each party’s own most-synchronized phrases, ranked within the party so the larger caucus can’t fill the table — every count travels with its caucus denominator.
D repeated phrases
- No phrase reached the threshold for this party today.
R repeated phrases
- No phrase reached the threshold for this party today.
Each table is one party measured against that party's own caucus, so row counts are not comparable across the two. Differences in how much each party publishes are measured in the nightly symmetry audit, not here. See the nightly symmetry audit.